10 June 2010

san sebastian

Posted by admin @ 17:40 pm    categories: FoodSpain

San Sebastian: La Concha

Last weekend, Ashley and Mateo and I went to San Sebastian. We had a great time, which is to say that it’s a beautiful city and has amazing food. San Sebastian (Donastia) is a city in the north of Spain, in the Basque country–very close to France. It’s known for its food, its beach (La Concha), and not all too much else.

We essentially took San Sebastian as a place to relax. Which is as it should be. We got there on Thursday — I took the train up, and met the two of them on the beach. La Concha, The Shell, the only beach we really frequented, is a gorgeous ring-shape, and the water is pretty warm all things considered–which is to say, considerably warmer than the water off the Oregon coast, but not quite as warm as Miami beach water. (How’s that for a stupidly long sentence?) It was a fun beach to visit, and we spent a lot of time there, as well as walking up and around the city, seeing the fortifications, and so forth.

Island near San Sebastian

El Peine de los Vientos -- the Wind-Comb

But I’m going to focus on the part of the trip that’s most worth writing about: eating food. Mostly, we ate tapas, there called pintxos (pronounced, and spelled in the rest of Spain, as pinchos). Pintxos are just small dishes; the way we did it was we went from bar to bar, trying pintxos. In the south, tapas usually come with a drink. Not so here, so it’s not cheap. But that’s okay.

Thursday night we started at a place called La Cuchara de San Telmo, recommended by my friend Ade, where I started out adventurously with pretty excellent foie. I don’t remember exactly how it was prepared, but it was surprisingly tasty. Ashley wasn’t so pleased with her bacalao. Second, we went to Ganbara, an unimpressive bar where I had bacalao, but we also got our first taste of the Basque white wine txakoli, which all three of us really liked. Third, we went to Txepetxa, perhaps one of the better places of the night, essentially a bar that serves anchovies on bread prepared with different toppings — all of them delicious. At the recommendation of the NYTimes article posted on the wall, I tried the one that came with eggs of an erizo de mar. Fourth, we went to Zeruko, a fancier bar that had beautiful pintxos; I had the first morcilla I’ve ever liked, served with a fried quail egg. I’m glad I gave it a chance. Lastly, we went to Restaurante Munto, another rather good bar — at least I was pleased. There, I had a pintxo with goat cheese and caramelized onions on bread — traditional, but always delicious. A good night.

Friday afternoon, we splurged, and went for the Menu de Degustación at Bodegón Alejandro, which I’m so glad we did. Here’s the menu (and here’s a picture of it, in Basque):
0: An amouse bouche of this asparagus-cream drink, with bread crisps. both salty, both tasty.
First course: A chilled marinated anchovy lasagna, with the anchovies laid atop a ratatouille base. It was pretty great; we gave it an A.
Second course: Fried tomato stuffed with chipirones (squid), on a bed of risotto made with the squid ink. I don’t always like squid ink, but it worked well, the cheese sauce was great, and the entire thing was amazing. A+
Third course: Grilled hake (merluza) with mashed potatoes and a sauce of mussel “juice” — not amazing, but buttery and savory. B
Fourth course: Glazed veal cheek on a terrine of bacon and potato slices, with a roasted red pepper sauce. This was very good, although kind of gluttonous. A-/B+
This was the last savory dish. After we finished, they brought us small glasses of a sweet orange wine, which I really liked (but I like sweet fruit wines).
Fifth course: Torrija (Spanish French toast, hah) with a caramelized top and cheese ice cream. This — well, both desserts — was amazing. Mateo thought it too sweet, but I disagree. Both get A/A+ ratings.
Sixth and final course: Slightly spicy peach gnocchi, with coconut ice cream and a vanilla-lemon sauce.
As we finished, they gave us drinks of leche merengada, which was more like egg nog than a milkshake. Also soft almond biscuits. Yeah. Anyway, certainly we were stuffed.

After a few hours at the beach, and a few hours of walking around, we had a bit of dinner:
First, we went to Izazpi, where I got a goat cheese, honey, onion, and pepper pintxo, which was quite good. Second, to A Fuego Negro, which was disappointing — a shrug-inducing cup of shrimp soup. Third, some good but not great risotto at Txondorra. I ended with an anchovia pintxo at Txepetxa again.

I have nothing else to add, nor pictures of the food.

Waves at el Peine de los Vientos

« « Older post | More recent post » »

21 April 2010

delicious!

Posted by admin @ 13:58 pm    categories: Food

So I have this recipe I make for a spicy peanut sauce, which is one of my favourite things in the world. I usually make it to put on top of pasta (well, better with Asian noodles) with some fresh vegetables.

The recipe is pretty simple; I’ve approximated it a few times when I didn’t have the recipe on hand. (One version I wrote down.) The real recipe calls for scallions instead of onions, a bit more peanut butter (total 1/4 cup), and quite a bit more sugar (1/3 cup). It also calls for ginger.

Anyway, I made this recipe on Sunday night, with pasta, steamed broccoli, and fresh cucumber slices. It’s a four-person recipe. Monday night I ate leftovers. Tuesday night, I bought two chicken breasts, chopped and saut&eeacute;ed them, and added the chicken pieces in as well. (I also bought some peanuts, which I hadn’t had.) And then tonight, there was only a small bowlful left. So I bought a zucchini, and saut&eeacute;ed it with salt and pepper. I made a bit more pasta. And then I heated the leftovers and the new pasta together with a bit of coconut milk (I had some leftover in the fridge) and an egg, until it was cooked, and then added in the zucchini. It’s just, wow. I’m not sure I could replicate it easily, but I’ll definitely try sometime: follow the normal peanut sauce recipe, but add an egg and replace some of the water with coconut milk. Also add salty-pepper-y zucchini.

Yumm.

Back to watching Mary Poppins. (Why? Because they played the babysitter song on This American Life. Sometimes I’m suggestible. Also I talked about it with either Emily or Ashley the other day. Or both? Dammit, I must be middle-aged already.)

« « Older post | More recent post » »

22 March 2010

relatively new obsession

Posted by admin @ 15:32 pm    categories: Food

Lindt chocolate bars. I have bought every type that appeals to me, I think; I just bought one of each type that they had at El Corte Inglés, spending nearly €20. Here’s the list.

  • Fine dark chocolate with fleur de sel / a touch of sea salt
  • Petits Desserts: Crema Catalana (crème brulée)
  • Dark chocolate with cherry and chili
  • 70% Dark
  • 80% Dark
  • Fine dark chocolate with chili
  • Dark chocolate with fig and caramel
  • Petits Desserts: Mousse au Chocolate (White Mousse)
  • Petits Desserts: Hazelnut filling
  • Mint

I think the mint is the worst one. The best are Hazelnut, Touch of Salt, Creme Catalana, and Fig/Caramel. The chili ones aren’t bad either. Apparently there’s a raspberry one, but I have yet to see it here.

Wow, this entry is inane.

« « Older post | More recent post » »

16 March 2010

eggplant, mushroom, and crusted tofu on rice

Posted by admin @ 15:36 pm    categories: Food

Ingredients
1 medium eggplant, cubed
1/2 onion (or small onion), diced
2 or 3 cloves of garlic, diced
1 package of tofu, pressed over towels to remove the water if not very dry, and then cubed
10-or-so [white button] mushrooms
1/3 cup shredded coconut
1/3 cup cream
hot sauce of some sort (I used leftover adobo from canned chipotle peppers); you could also use indian spices like cumin and turmeric, or cayenne
(olive) oil
salt and pepper
corn starch

rice (or noodles, I suppose)

Directions
0. Cook rice, if using.
1. Heat the oil, and add the onion. After a minute or two, add the cubes of eggplant. Cook on medium, adding oil as necessary (a few tablespoons may be needed; eggplant loves the stuff), and stirring every few minutes, until eggplant glistens and is done; it may take a while. When it nears done, add the garlic. (Add it earlier if you’re not a garlic fan.)
2. Toss the tofu in some corn starch (a few spoonfuls is fine) and black pepper to coat.
3. In a separate pan, heat a tablespoon of oil on medium or medium-high. When hot, add the tofu. Cook, tossing occasionally, until it crisps and browns. It will take less time than the eggplant.
4. Add the cream, hot sauce, and mushrooms to the eggplant. (If you like, you could also sautee the mushrooms separately as well. It would taste better, but involves three things cooking at once.) Cook, stirring occasionally, until the mushrooms are hot. Add the coconut. Add the tofu.
5. Serve over rice. Delicious!

« « Older post | More recent post » »

2 March 2010

dinner tonight and a few nights ago

Posted by admin @ 13:15 pm    categories: Food

1/2 to 3/4 cup sliced white mushrooms
1 package seitan
1/2 to 3/4 cup coconut milk
2 tsp curry
salt and pepper to taste
1/2 pound shaped pasta (farfalle, e.g.)

Cook the pasta. Saute the mushrooms in hot oil, roughly 3 minutes. Salt and pepper them as they cook. Add the seitan and spices. When it has warmed slightly, add the coconut milk. Heat until everything is warmed. Add to pasta.

Simple, but really good. Maybe in part because it had been a long time since I ate seitan.

« « Older post | More recent post » »

26 January 2010

some psych work at last

Posted by admin @ 16:42 pm    categories: FoodPsychology

I went today to a third meeting at the Complutense University of Madrid, this time for the head of the MEG/EEG center there (who’s* also in charge of the Psychiatry Department in the Medical School) to give me some instructions. I got there on-time, but had said I’d be late, so I walked in at 17:20, to find that he wasn’t there. I sat in a waiting room at the end of the hall (I should add that the hallway had the lights off, and that his office was the only one with anyone in it — not surprising perhaps since many professors don’t keep long office hours, but still weird) until the secretary/assistant/coordinator (I’m not sure) invited me into her office, which was heated. At maybe 17:45, Professor O. arrived, and rushed into a meeting that had been postponed, I believe. I read from Panorama, the McSweeney’s newspaper-and-magazine that I got for the holiday’s (it’s awesome — all the articles are engaging, even those that I don’t care much about; here’s one they’ve put online). Eventually, I started thinking of leaving, but I figured I’d just be playing on the internet.

Shortly thereafter, Professor O. invited me and the woman into the other room, and demonstrated these glasses that they’re using for an experiment — sunglasses with a camera on the top, hidden, for blind men to wear. I believe — this was all in very fast Spanish. Decidedly, they’re doing a study on attention and motivation (stuff I’ve worked on before!) in the blind, but how exactly the study is going on I’m still unclear on. I think they all already knew, so that was one of the main problems. In any case, there were four men — all professors or academics, at least one an engineer — talking about the study, and we sat with them for a bit. They ended up in a discussion of whether attention and motivation are separate processes or one process with two different names, which I found awesome: both the question, and the fact that I could understand it. (I think it’s quite likely they’re the same process, even if they’re that process working differently. Professor O. thinks the same; the engineer disagreed. I said a word or five, and they listened, but obviously I was slow to speak. I would’ve been even if they were speaking English; they were almost all at least twice my age.)

After the meeting wound down, Professor O. and I met briefly, and he described the plans: he wants me to do some research on the topics of positive and negative emotion as they relate to EEG waves, the two hemispheres of the brain, and picture/word presentation. In some senses, this is very similar to things I’ve done. But it’s kind of exciting, and the eventual plan is to move this study onto looking at depression. I won’t be there for that, but he intends to involve me for the entirety of this study — designing it, analyzing data, writing the paper. I’m not sure why he’s being so helpful, but I guess in some sense he’s gaining me as someone who’s excited to help run a study he wants run, and and that’s a great thing. I’m excited, for my part. If all goes well, we’ll get to publish something. And if we get stymied, I’ll certainly have a lot of great experience. I imagine I may talk more about the research I’m doing, if it’s interesting, on this forum. I’ll warn you.


* It had been a long time since I had thought of the difference between whose and who’s. I had to teach them this week. It’s generally so instinctive. Except when it’s not. I often make the written mistake of they’re versus their. And right vs. write, which is probably my worst mistake. They’re so simple to do, when you’re writing (or typing) quickly. Clearly the mistake has nought to do with not knowing, and much to do with mistaking something.

A note: I made soup with all that chicken stock I made the other day. Today, so a bit later than I thought. I’ll have it for dinner tomorrow, and Thursday, and I’d probably have enough for two more days besides if I weren’t going to Dublin. It’s spicy, and pretty good. I used half an onion flavoured with a red chili (not sure what kind — it wasn’t labeled in the greengrocer’s) and some cumin and turmeric; I added half a green pepper, broccoli, garbanzo beans, tiny pasta like orzo, and eggplant (cooked separately). In that order. Not bad for something just using all of my vegetables in the fridge.

« « Older post | More recent post » »

21 January 2010

nerd! 1: books. 1.5: climbing. 2: food.

Posted by admin @ 16:52 pm    categories: Foodwriting

So there’s no real excuse for this.

When I was in eighth grade, I think, I started reading a series called The Wheel of Time, written by a man known as Robert Jordan. (That’s a pseudonym, for no good reason that I know of. He just always wrote this series with this pseudonym, and others with different ones.) It’s epic fantasy in the most ridiculous way possible. By which I mean: it’s quite literally epic, in that there are currently 12 books (with two more forthcoming) and over 10,500 paperback pages (thanks, wikipedia). Yeah. By comparison, The Lord of the Rings is three books long. George R.R. Martin’s The Song of Ice and Fire (which I read three books from in high school, and ended up finding surprisingly distasteful) is four books long (although three more are projected). Terry Goodkind’s godawful (the first two were good, and then I got disgusted) Sword of Truth series is eleven books long, I guess. WoT (as it’s often abbreviated) has sold almost twice as many books as the Goodkind series, around 44 million copies. Martin’s series is considerably shorter. The only fantasy series I ever liked as much as WoT was Tad William’s Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn trilogy (beginning with The Dragonbone Chair and feeling very much like something Lloyd Alexander might’ve written). (To be fair, I didn’t finish the third back in that series until years after I first tried it. But that doesn’t fault the beginning.) There is also some more elf-heavy fiction, which I’ve managed to almost block out of my mind. Like Terry Brook’s Shannara series, which I’m kind of happy to forget.

Anyway, I guess the point is that most fantasy isn’t quite so large-scale as Jordan’s, and clearly I’m not the only one who admires that. Anyway, over break I picked up the series (I started on book two, and ended up just keeping on going), and now I’m reading book eleven. Twelve was released in November, I think, co-written by Brandon Sanderson because Jordan died three years ago, now. Leaving copious notes, and a wish that the books be finished.

I do acknowledge, reading these for my third time, that there are lots of things that bother me. I especially notice the things that maybe only happen twice a book, but happen twice every book. There are things like braid-pulling that happen way too often. Phrases like “his cloak would’ve made a tinker blush” are used every time a certain character appears (he’s supposed to wear a too-colorful cloak). I am frustrated when characters do stupid things. For example, characters who are not only on the same side, but also friends, don’t share important information with each other. Sometimes motivations are weak — I still don’t quite get why many of the villains switched sides not just to a different side but to the evil side. It’s one thing when the villain is, you know, a king who wants to rule the world. It’s another when the ultimate villain is the Dark One, a devil who touches the world and enjoys torture, death, and destruction, and expects his followers to as well. Someone who’s jealous might turn on their friends, but not so far as to embrace sadism. Or maybe once, but not over and over again. Right? Maybe I’m being re-naïve.

In any case, this is tons of fun. I like reading these books. I’m reading the eleventh one for the first time, I’m pretty sure (I didn’t own it, and I don’t remember it), and then I’ll have to switch writing styles and read (well, listen to, on audio book) the twelfth. And then I’ll be dry at least until November.

I’m not even going to try describing the plot. Wikipedia does an okay job, but if you’re at all interested then you should pick up the first book, The Eye of the World. It’s kind of pulp fiction, but well-written and well-thought-out for the most part. The characters have distinct personalities. Occasionally you get lost, but there are websites for looking that sort of thing up. Also a brief glossary in the back of the books.

Actually, there are a ridiculous number of websites dedicated to WoT. Not just wikis, of which there are at least two, but “scholarly” sites where people write up their theories, or think about the roots of Jordan’s ideas, or any such thing. It’s quite fun. And useful, when you’re lost, or want to know whether people think the same thing you do. Unfortunately, the websites DO assume you’ve read everything (obviously), and so sometimes give out spoilers.

In other news:

Today, I went rock climbing! It was quite a lot of fun. I feel a bit more comfortable at the place, although I still don’t really say more than two words to anyone other than the woman working at the desk. Still, it feels good to be exercising more than yoga on occasion, and if I couldn’t do anything difficult and felt tired quickly, then it’s well that I finally bought a ten-visit pass and will be going in ten times over the next three months. At least. I’ll try and use it faster. If I go twice a week, then I’ll buy a monthly membership. That’d be fun!

On Tuesday, despite being exhausted, on a whim I bought a tiny (1.5 kilo) chicken from the butcher’s (that’s a bit more than 3 pounds) for €4. The guy threw in two chicken carcasses for free, too, which was nice. So I roasted the chicken that night, more or less following this recipe. More “more” than less, except that I only left it to rest for an hour and a half or so. Even so, it turned out splendidly. Crispy skin, moist breasts, maybe a tiny bit soggy since the lemon had a lot of juice. I had the chicken and potatoes for dinner that night and last night as well.

I also saved two things: first, the chicken carcass, bad meat, joints, and skin. Second, the oil and drippings left in the pan. The latter I used for tonight’s dinner, which was fantastic: I took the last pieces of chicken, and fried them in a bit of (lemon) chicken fat with green peppers, just to warm them. I made rice with stock. I sautéed mushrooms in butter (Michael Ruhlman has an excellent meditation on how best to cook mushrooms, which I didn’t quite follow, since I used butter, but sort of did). And then I made tacos, just peppers, mushrooms, rice, and chicken. Delicious.

The reason I had stock to make rice in, of course, is that I made it. Two raw chicken carcasses, plus one roasted chicken carcass, plus a €1 selection of celery, leek, and carrots from the supermarket, plus some leftover cilantro and some garlic and an onion. I bought a new, bigger pot today, primarily because we needed one (for €15 — I doubt it’ll last more than a year, but I’ll be gone then), and it sat with water turning into stock for around five hours. (I followed Ruhlam’s book for this one. He knows that stuff back-and-front.) I’ll put the stock in the fridge for the night, and then make soup tomorrow, I think. But for now, it made some very soft, flavorful rice.

« « Older post | More recent post » »

11 January 2010

vitamins

Posted by admin @ 12:08 pm    categories: FoodPsychology

There’s a fascinating article in Slate about vitamins (especially multivitamins) and their efficacy. It’s a question that I’ve long wondered about: just how well do vitamins work? As I briefly mentioned before, Michael Pollan suggests that we should be making sure to eat foods that have important vitamins — but that popping pills of those vitamins might not be so effective. Emily Anthes, in this article, says something along the same lines — maybe we’re not accomplishing as much as we should think, by taking multi-vitamins.

Our flour and water and many of the foods we buy already have extra nutrients embedded within them, thanks to laws in the US, and if we’re eating healthful foods, we’re probably getting many of the rest. I don’t know that I’ll warrant that supplements are bad — not until the evidence builds up a bit more — but I do wonder about the usefulness of taking vitamins every day.

In any case, I definitely recommend giving the article a read. The best part about it? I spent the first half of the article thinking to myself, “Huh. It’s interesting that they’re suggesting that so many of these vitamins can affect the body in a possibly negative way, but what about the placebo effect?”, and then the second half is about the placebo effect. The brain is decidedly able to change the body. It can be undermined anyway, though.

« « Older post | More recent post » »

11 December 2009

food I have cooked recently

Posted by admin @ 8:07 am    categories: Food

biscotti

Yeah, yeah. Boring post, especially without good photos of most of it. Shrug. I took photos. They just were blurry.

1. One of my favourite recipes: Chocolate-almond biscotti. In Spanish, they call them cantuccini, which is also the word in italian. They burned very slightly (I don’t know why — bad pan?) but they were delicious anyway. I brought them into school and had almost every teacher at my school tell me they were delicious. Although they all thought of them as brownies. Weird.

2. Sandwich: freshly-sliced chorizo iberico, brie, and tomatoes. This is what I’m eating right now. It’s delicious. I kind of got sick of chorizo, but then I realized that the solution was to on occasion buy good chorizo and to avoid the cheaper supermarket-bought stuff. So I went today on my way home from work to the butcher, and got them to slice me some. It’s not cheap, but it’s quite a bit better. Less gross-and-fatty, for one thing. Not as spicy, though — probably I should ask for a spicier version next time. But yes, chorizo goes well with brie.

3. Dulce de leche. I used, as ever, a slight modification of thekitchn.com‘s recipe for dulce de leche. It’s quite good, by my standards. For whatever reasons, it doesn’t come out as well here — not using a good pot, since we only have a bad one, is my main excuse — it just never thickens all the way. Oh, also the fact that I don’t know how much baking soda I’m using, since I don’t have measuring spoons. (Should bring some back from the States with me…) But delicious nonetheless. Tasted right this time.

To redux the recipe (and misuse that word):

  • 1 quart of milk
  • 1 cup of sugar
  • 1/2 tsp. baking soda (dissolved in 1 Tbsp water)

You bring the milk & sugar to a simmer, add the sodium bicarbonate when the pan’s off the heat, and then simmer for an hour-and-a-half or so until it’s the right color and the right thickness. The baking soda thickens the mixture; the milk slowly browns (Maillard reaction!), and eventually it looks like caramel, and tastes even better. Yep.

4. Ginger snaps. I used a recipe from the Homesick Texan, another foodblog I really like, but honestly wasn’t so impressed. I mean, I like her recipes; I’ve used her quite often actually. But I dunno. I found these kind of boring. Also, mine were ginger snaps even though they weren’t supposed to be. I guess I can blame that on the oven, again. I think I’m going to give Clotilde Dusoulier’s recipe a try this weekend, I think. I even bought candied ginger for that purpose, although I’ve found that it’s fucking delicious on its own, and I want to try making it myself.

5. Finally an perhaps most excitingly, I made the recipe from Mark Bittman’s Minimalist column: Pasta with mushrooms, risotto-style. It’s a really good recipe. I altered it quite a bit, as he suggests; I used oyster mushrooms (because that was what I could find — I’m not actually a big fan of them; they’re too spongy) and no chicken, and added in frozen spinach at the last minute. I was going to use some raisins, too, but decided I didn’t want to. I definitely do recommend using the white wine, though: it makes it smell amazing. Then again, cheap white wine is really cheap here. Anyway, I was a big fan. I had it for dinner for two nights, and for one day’s lunch.

« « Older post | More recent post » »

8 December 2009

some thoughts on Dutch food

Posted by admin @ 10:09 am    categories: Foodtraveling

Amsterdam-canal

So this weekend was a long weekend here in Spain, because today is the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. I know; I’d never really heard of it either. But apparently it’s a national holiday here. (To be fair, a lot of the kids at my school knew they got the day off but didn’t know what for.) Anyway, I went to Amsterdam to visit my friend Dan, from Haverford, who’s doing a Fulbright research project in a small town called Groningen in the northern Netherlands.

(Netherlands side-note: Nether-land, low-lands — that’s what we call the country today. They call it Nederland, which I assume means the same thing. In French and Spanish, it’s the same idea; Pays Bas, Paises Bajos. Except not really, in Spanish. I mean, they can say that, but they tend to just call it Holanda and call the language there (Dutch, in English) Holandés or even Flamenco (Flemish). Which seems odd to me since neither is really correct — the language is correctly Neerlandés. Then again, we still sometimes say Holland to describe the country, which is not quite correct, since Holland is only part of the country. (The west-and-south.) It includes most of the big cities, though.)

Anyway, yes. Dutch is a weird language — a little like German, which I also don’t speak, but unique nonetheless. Interestingly, I can hear conversations in Dutch and think for a few moments that it’s English — similar intonations, I guess? But it does sound different, of course: consider the name of Dan’s city. It’s not pronounced Grow-nin-gen, not the way we would say it. Dan explained that when he first got here he would ask English-speakers something about it, and they wouldn’t know what he was talking about. The pronunciation can be heard here. The g is a soft-k, maybe, and the r is very slightly rolled. Not really sounds we have in English. Of course, most of the Dutch speak fluent English. I definitely met a number of people in stores and the like who spoke perfect English — most of them with an American accent — that could’ve convinced me they were foreigners except for their speaking Dutch with their co-workers. Even the people with bad English speak it in a way that’s easy to understand, for the most part, I think since the sounds of the languages are quite similar.

Right, so we’re three paragraphs in and I have yet to mention food. Well. I was in Amsterdam for three full days. In that time, I managed to eat some Dutch food, and a lot of Asian food. We also managed to get good Belgian beer (oh man, a fantastic Tripel ale, a Gouden Carolus — at a cool bar called Gollem, Raamsteeg 4), and see several museums: the Van Gogh museum (the gh in Gogh is pronounced with that soft k, again, which I did know), which wasn’t amazing but wasn’t bad; the Rijksmuseum, which was kind of not as impressive as I would’ve liked (it’s been undergoing rennovations for a long while now, although honestly I think I was just expecting some amazing portraiture and some cool landscapes; there were landscapes but I mean, all the good Bosch paintings are elsewhere, and I mean the Brueghel clan are almost unilaterally displayed elsewhere), although it has some nice Rembrandts and a Vermeer (Girl with a Pearl Earring is in the Hague, though); the Tropenmuseum, or Museum of the Tropics, essentially a cultural anthropology museum with collections of things from old Dutch colonies, and a kind of intriguing exhibit about Surinam and the “Maroons” there, which I knew very little about, as well as this modern art exhibition of work by this guy Henri Dono; the Heinekein “museum”, which was essentially a tour of an old Heinekein factory that gave us free beer but honestly wasn’t really worth it; and finally the church — De Neuwe Kerk, which had an exhibition about Oman and was also just a kind of cool no-longer-used-as-a-church. We also walked around a lot, explored most of the interlocking landmasses that make up the center city of Amsterdam. Saw this beautiful old ship-related building, wandered through the Red Light District and saw the Old Church there, walked through two markets.

Which actually brings me finally to the original point: Dan’s not a big Dutch-speaker, but he’s been into exploring Dutch foods, at least to the point that he knew what was going on when we went to the open-air street markets. Now, street markets in Madrid aren’t really food places, and even in Argentina most of the food sold in them was prepared foods, but street markets in the Netherlands seem to be about half food and half other-things. So besides prepared foods, they have vegetable stands, butcher’s stands, poultry stands, fish stands, and so forth. Some have significantly different prices, it seems. We went to two, although the second was almost entirely closed by the time we got there — one was the Albert Cuypmarkt, and the other was the Dappermarkt, both in the South. Things we ate at the markets:

1. Fresh stroopwafel, sort of like the cones of dulce de leche they sell in Argentina, but more like caramel and less sweet.
2. Hollandse Nieuwe, or soused herring, a sandwhich (so technically Broodje Haring) with cold stewed herring, onions, and pickels. Very strange, and with this weird gelatinous texture, but not bad at all.
3. A pastry filled with almond paste, which was possibly called Banketstaaf (according to google, that might be it). Interesting but not wonderful.
4. Apple pastries. No clue what they’re called, although surely the word is appel in dutch. But they were basic, delicious sweet pastries filled with apples and goo.
5. We bought fresh whole mackerel, and fried it in a pan at our hostel, with rice and asparagus on the side, and some store-bought garlic-pepper sauce. It was actually very good. Dan did the mackerel, I did the sides. Weird for me to eat from a whole fish, but still.

All of those things are typical Dutch foods, understand. We also had Dutch pancakes, called Pannekoeken, which honestly are more like a cross between pancakes and crepes than either one. See? Those we got in a restaurant on Sunday afternoon, for lunch — mine came with bacon and apple slices. I was interested by the fact that both the apples here and those in the pastries are cored and then sliced down the center, rather than quartered first — you end up with apple rings, yes?

Anyway, we also ate some good Asian food:

1. Indonesian. On Friday night, we went out to eat at this place called Coffee & Jazz (Utrechtsestraat 113), which our guide book claimed was cheap. It wasn’t, not really, but we ate a full meal that was mighty delicious. There were five tables, and one cook/waiter/owner, who clearly loved the fact that he’s labeled as eccentric (he had print-outs of reviews that called him such, on the table) and made us saté, and then two chicken dishes with veggies and served on quite good rice with toasted coconut. Definitely the best meal we had.
2. Surinamese. Okay, sort of. It was a Surinamese/Chinese/(Indonesian) restaurant (Kam Yin, Warmoestraat 8) in the north of the Red Light District, before it really starts, and it was super-cheap and pretty good — I had Surinamese roti, which I quite liked. I know Surinam isn’t in Asia (it’s next to Guinea), but for whatever reason the food was pretty damn Asian. As it says on wikipedia, “In Suriname roti refers mainly to roti dahlpuri or roti aloopuri. It is most often eaten with chicken curry. Roti can also refer to a dish of stuffed and spiced roti wraps. Due to mass emigration of Surinam Hindustani in the 1970s, roti became a popular take-out dish in The Netherlands. It usually includes chicken curry, potatoes, boiled eggs and various vegetables, most notably the kousenband or yardlong bean. Another variation includes shrimp and aubergine. It is custom to eat the dish by hand.”

Right, so there we go. My trip to Amsterdam, as though it were a food vacation. I need to do some more food-explorations of Madrid. Jeez.

« « Older post | More recent post » »
Older Posts »

This is the online journal of Justin Dainer-Best, detailing my adventures. To the right are links to other parts of the site.

I'll sometimes cross-post things from other online manifestations of me, perhaps.

View posts about psychology, art, food and cooking, the Spanish language, or teaching. You can also read my writing I've posted here. Or read old posts about Argentina.

To syndicate, use RSS